Afghanistan National Archives: Firuzkuh 92
  • Details
  • Tags
  • Transcriptions
  • Translations
Details
Download

Download IEDC Data

You are about to download data for the current text from the IEDC database.

To start the download, please click on your desired format below.

Note: it can take up to several minutes to download your data, so please wait whilst it processes

Download started

Content

Legal query (istiftā) regarding whether a judge can compel a seller’s representative to return the payment received for a sale that has since been annulled. The annulment was carried out willingly by the seller, and the buyer (the nephew) accepted it without raising any claims against the seller. The respondent rules that the judge does not have authority to enforce such a repayment.

Dates

(Dates unknown)

Details

Firuzkuh 92
Silver (given following internal peer review)
New Persian (Arabic script)
Legal
Legal: Istiftā

Physical Description

paper
Complete, black ink
3
horizontal

People

Publications

IEDC Data

1172
26/01/2025
23/03/2026

Citations

Ofir Haim
Arezou Azad, Mateen Arghandehpour, Nabi Saqee
The transcription has been revised from a previous publication (see Publications), the translation is the original work of the IEDC Team (as yet unpublished in peer-review print)
See 'How to Cite'
Images of this Text displayed on this web page are provided by Nabi Saqee.
© Nabi Saqee, All rights reserved.
If you wish to reproduce these images please contact Nabi Saqee.

Contact

invisible_east@conted.ox.ac.uk (Please include the above permalink when contacting the editorial team about this Text)
Folios
1. recto
Tags
Folio:
Transcription
Folio:
 قاضی را رسد کی وکیل را جبر کند کی بها بفروشنده باز ده  1
چون فروشنده بطوع اقالت کرده است وخواهرزاده این اقالت را  2
منکر نشده است و دعوی نمی کند و مدعی جهه این اقالت بر فروشنده نیست   3
یا نی بیان فرمایند  4
                     نی والله اعلم   5
Translation
Folio:
1 Can a judge compel [the seller's] attorney-in-fact to return the [buyer’s] payment made to the seller, 
2 [given that] the seller has willingly annulled [the sale], and the nephew [i.e. the buyer] neither   
3 challenged nor disputed this annulment, and the seller has not made any [further] claim [regarding the annulment.  
4 [Yes] or no? Kindly explain. 
5                         No. God knows best. 
Afghanistan National Archives: Firuzkuh 92: Folio (recto)
Images courtesy of Nabi Saqee